https://static.javadoc.io/com.thoughtworks.dsl/dsl_2.12/1.0.0-RC10/com/thoughtworks/dsl/index.html
As per the docs:
We also provide some built-in DSLs for asynchronous programming, collection manipulation, and adapters to scalaz.Monad or cats.Monad. Those built-in DSLs can be used as a replacement of for comprehension, scala-continuations, scala-async, Monadless, effectful and ThoughtWorks Each.
I have just completed writing a few Actors to solve the issue i had discussed in a previous post:
https://jmenke.blogspot.com/2018/04/backpressure-and-wasted-compute-cycles.html
I used become and Akka's FSM classes to provide a simple version and a version that used Master / Workers as I had talked about in the last post.
Now i see this:
For example, the akka provides a DSL to create finite-state machines, which consists of some domain-specific keywords like when, goto and stay. Unfortunately, you cannot embedded those keywords into your ordinary
if
/ while
/ try
control flows, because Akka's DSL is required to be split into small closures, preventing ordinary control flows from crossing the boundary of those closures.and then
For example, stateless-future-akka, based on
stateless-future
, provides a special final result type for akka actors. Unlike akka.actor.AbstractFSM's inconsistent control flows, users can create complex finite-state machines from simple ordinary control flows along with stateless-future-akka
's domain-specific keyword nextMessage
.Maybe this DSL can overcome some of the limitations of using the FSM syntax? I think I have to try it out to see.
No comments:
Post a Comment